Home Science
1.ON FARM TRAIL
1. Name of the technology : Assessment of Coating Formulations to improve the Shelf life of Fruits and Vegetables
2. Nature of intervention : OFT- Kharif/ Rabi 2022-23
3. Crop & Farming Situation: Fruits and Vegetables
4. Purpose : To increase the shelf life
5. Number : Approved Achieved
1. Area : -- --
2. No. of farmers :5 5
6 –13
S. no |
Farmers name |
Village/Mandal |
Name of the Tech. |
Duration (Days) |
|
Demo |
Farmer practice |
||||
1 |
Siridha. D |
Bodebanda |
Coating Formulations to improve the Shelf life |
7 |
7 |
2 |
Shyamala.H |
Kotekal |
|||
3 |
Veeresh.P |
Kotekal |
|||
4 |
Diwakar |
Venkatapuram |
|||
5 |
Bhavitha |
Nandavaram |
Fruits/ vegetables |
T1 (CONC) |
T2 (DILUTED with water ) |
T3 (F.P) |
|||||||
Qty (no.) |
Shelf life |
Loss (%) |
Colour |
Shelf life |
Loss (%) |
Colour |
Shelf life |
Loss (%) |
Colour |
|
Brinjal |
5 |
5 |
25 |
No Change |
4 |
25 |
No Change |
3 |
75 |
Change |
Beans |
20 |
4 |
35 |
No Change |
3 |
37.5 |
No Change |
2 |
55 |
Change |
Ridge guard |
4 . |
4 |
25 |
No Change |
4 |
25 |
No Change |
2 |
50 |
Change |
Fruits/ vegetables |
T1 (CONC) |
T2 (DILUTED with water) |
T3 (F.P) |
|||||||
Qty (no.) |
Shelf life |
Loss (%) |
Colour |
Shelf life |
Loss (%) |
Colour |
Shelf life |
Loss (%) |
Colour |
|
Tomato |
4 |
5 |
25 |
No Change |
7 |
25 |
No Change |
2 |
75 |
Change |
Bhendi |
20 |
5 |
30 |
No Change |
3 |
40 |
No Change |
3 |
60 |
Change |
There is an increase in shelf life of vegetables with 40 to 60 %
No change in taste after cooking
14. Farmers reaction : Farmers expressed their willingness to adopt the technology
15. Constraints : Nil
16. Feed back
1. To the Scientist:
2. To the extension personnel:
17. Whether continued during : Discontinued as per the instructions given at Action Plan Review Meeting 2023-24
2023-24 or not reasons
18. Remarks :
2.ON FARM TRAIL
1. Name of the technology : Assessing the performance of different hand weeder for weeding as
drudgery reducing equipments
2. Nature of intervention : OFT- Kharif/ Rabi 2022-23
3. Crop & Farming Situation : Vegetable crops
4. Purpose : To reduce drudgery during weeding
To assess the time taken for harvesting the crop by traditional method and
improved method
5. Number : Approved Achieved
1. Area : 5 ha 5 ha
2. No. of farmers : 5 5
6 –13
S. no |
Farmers name
|
Village/Mandal
|
Name of the Tech. |
Duration (Days) |
|
Demo |
Farmer practice |
||||
1 |
J.P.Swamy |
Kotekal |
CRIDA and CRIJAF wheel hoe |
90 days |
90 days |
2 |
B. Chinnaeranna |
Banavasi |
|||
3 |
E.Yogendra |
Mekadona |
|||
4 |
Narayana.M |
Chennapuram |
|||
5 |
P.Keshamma |
Thimmapuram |
Parameters |
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
Work done area |
0.4 ha |
0.4 ha |
0.4ha |
Labour required |
6 |
8 |
14 |
Labour wages |
Rs.900 per ha @ 150/labour |
Rs.1200 per ha @ 150/labour |
Rs.2100 per ha @ 150/labour |
Time taken for weeding |
4 hr |
6 hr |
8hr |
Drudgery index Score |
35% (Minimum) |
42% (Minimum) |
68% (Moderate) |
It was observed that drudgery was reduced to minimum with 35% when compare to farmers practice i.e. 68 % (Moderate)
When compare to farmers practice, weeding with CRIDA wheel hoe has saved an amount of Rs. 1200/- per acre
Farm Women able to work easily with wheel hoe and accepted the technology
14. Farmers reaction :bhendi crop without causing any health problems
15. Constraints : NIL
16. Feed back : Farm women accepted the technology as it is user friendly and drudgery was
reduced with the use of wheel hoe when compare to farmers practice.
1. To the Scientist :
2. To the extension personnel:
17. Whether continued during : Discontinued as per the instructions given at Action Plan Review Meeting 2023-24
2023-24 or not reasons
18. Remarks :
1.FRONT LINE DEMONSTRATIONS
1. Name of the technology :Demonstration of Nutri kitchen garden
2. Nature of intervention : FLD- Kharif/ Rabi 2022-23
3. Crop & Farming Situation: Vegetable crops
4. Purpose : To demonstrate the role of Nutrition garden in farmer’s house holds
Maintaining the nutritional adequacy of adopted farm family
5. Number : Approved Achieved
1. Area : 5 cents 5cents
2. No. of farmers :10 10
6 –13
S. no |
Farmers name
|
Village/Mandal
|
Name of the Tech. |
Duration (Days) |
|
Demo |
Farmer practice |
||||
1 |
N.Maheshwari |
Mugathi |
Nutri kitchen garden kits |
90 days |
90 days |
2 |
P.Keshamma |
Thimmapuram |
|||
3 |
K.Umamaheswari |
Adoni |
|||
4 |
Chandrakala |
Adini |
|||
5 |
Sridevi |
Gajuladenne |
|||
6 |
Madamma |
Gajuladenne |
|||
7 |
Suvarnamma |
Mugathi |
|||
8 |
Bhavitha |
Nandavaram |
|||
9 |
J.P.Swamy |
Kotekal |
|||
10 |
Dastagiri |
Bichigeri |
Particulars |
Expenditure incurred(Rs) |
Vegetable Gross yield (Kg) |
Household consumption (4 no.) in Kg |
Total (Rs) |
Amount saved(Rs) Kg-Rs 15 (Appox) |
Additional Income generated (Rs) |
1 Month |
150 |
60 |
35 |
900 |
575 |
375 |
6 Months |
- |
360 |
210 |
5400 |
3150 |
2250 |
40 per cent increase in consumption of vegetables was observed with the nutri kitchen garden
Saved and amount of Rs.375 /- with sales of vegetables after consumption
14. Farmers reaction : Establishment of a nutri-kitchen garden has reduced nutritional deficiencies and also providing a source of Supplementary income
15. Constraints:
16. Feed back
1. To the Scientist:
2. To the extension personnel:
17. Whether continued during
2019-20 or not reasons : Continued
18. Remarks :
2.Front line Demonstrations
1. Name of the technology : Demonstration on value addition to tomato
2. Nature of intervention : FLD -Kharif-2023-24
3. Crop & Farming Situation : Tomatoes
4. Purpose : Value addition to tomato
5. Numbered : Approved Achieved
1. Area : -- --
2. No. of farmers : 10 10
6. –13
S. no |
Farmers name
|
Village/Mandal
|
Crop |
Name of the Tech. |
|
1. |
Sravani |
Venkatapuram |
Tomato |
Tomato value addition |
|
2. |
Adilakshmi |
Venkatapuram |
|||
3. |
Vasavi |
Kurnool |
|||
4. |
N. Sekhar |
Kurnool |
|||
5. |
Md. Althaf |
Kurnool |
|||
6. |
Diwakar |
Venkatapuram |
|||
7. |
HB.Goverdhanreddy |
Pedda Harivanam |
|||
8. |
K.Gopi |
Pedda Harivanam |
|||
9. |
U.Venkatesh |
Kadivella |
|||
10. |
G.Suresh |
Chilakadona |
Previous results:
1. Total Antioxidants
S.No |
Name of the test |
Results(mg/100g) |
1. |
Sun dried |
0.181 |
2. |
Dehydrator |
0.192 |
2. Lycopene content
S.No |
Name of the test |
Results (mg/100g) |
1. |
Sun dried |
17.72 |
2. |
Dehydrator |
17.84 |
3.Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C)
S.No |
Name of the test |
Results (mg/100g) |
1. |
Sun dried |
0.0064 |
2. |
Dehydrator |
0.0077 |
It was observed that total antioxidants, lycopene and ascorbic acid content was found to be high in dehydrated dried powder compare to the sun dried powder.These observations may serve as guidance on selection of dehydrated tomato powder that can be consumed to meet the daily requirements.
Demonstrations on value-added products with tomato like tomato jam, toffee, Candies and ketchup were given to farmers, farm women, and rural youth.
14. Farmers reaction :Accepted the technology and interested to take up as an entrepreneur activity
15. Constraints :
16. Feed back
1. To the Scientist :
2. To the extension personnel:
17. Whether continued during
2023-24 not reasons : Continued under OFT on Assessment of capacity of drying equipment for fruits & vegetables 2023-24
18. Remarks :
3. Front line Demonstrations
1. Name of the technology : Demonstration on value addition to pulses
2. Nature of intervention : FLD-2023-24
3. Crop & Farming Situation : Red gram
4. Purpose : Value addition
5. Numbered : Approved Achieved
1. No. of farmers : 10 10
6. –13
S. no |
Farmers name
|
Village/Mandal
|
Crop |
Name of the technology |
|
1 |
E.Rangaswamy |
Arekal |
Red gram |
Dall mill |
|
2 |
C. Ravi kumar |
Arekal |
|||
3 |
J.Parameshwara swamy |
Arekal |
|||
4 |
A.Sharamma |
Arekal |
|||
5 |
S.hanthi bai |
Bichegeri |
|||
6 |
B.Jakkapa |
Bichegeri |
|||
7 |
Basavaraju |
Chennapuram |
|||
8 |
Diwakar |
Venkatapuram |
|||
9 |
S.Gowsia begum |
Yemmiganur |
|||
10 |
M.Satish Chandra |
Kurnool |
Previous results
Cost estimates of Red gram Dal for 1 Quintal
Redgram |
Rs. 7000/- |
Processing charges |
Rs. 500/- |
Labour charges |
Rs. 500/- |
Packing and labelling charges |
Rs. 400/- |
Total |
Rs. 8400/- |
Quantity of dal obtained after processing |
80 kg |
Cost of 1 kg dal |
130/- |
Total Income |
Rs. 10,400/- |
Value addition to red gram to toor dal has increased the farmer's income by Rs. 2000.
Converting surplus production to value added product has increased the income of the farmer
14. Farmers reaction : Expressed interest in the establishment of the dall mill under entrepreneurship development
15. Constraints :
16. Feed back
1. To the Scientist : Converting surplus production to value added product has increased the income of the farmer
2. To the extension personnel:
17. Whether continued during
2019-20or not reasons : Discontinued and changed to method demonstration as per the instructions given at Action Plan Review Meeting 2023-24
18. Remarks : --